Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorShear, M
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Suvir
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-20T13:38:53Z
dc.date.available2022-04-20T13:38:53Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/9059
dc.descriptionMagister Chirurgiae Dentium (MChD)en_US
dc.description.abstractRobinson and Martinez first introduced the entity of unicystic ameloblastoma in 1977. Since then numerous case reports and series have been published. The evidence suggests that a more conservative approach can be used successfully to treat the unicystic ameloblastoma. The term unicystic is derived from the macro- and microscopic appearance of the lesion, whereas the term unilocular is used in radiological interpretation to describe a radiolucency having one loculus or compartment. Much confusion stems from the fact that a unicystic ameloblastoma might appear not only as a unilocular lesion, but also as what is often interpreted as a multilocular bone defect.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectAmeloblastomaen_US
dc.subjectUnilocular lesionen_US
dc.subjectRadiologicalen_US
dc.titleUnicystic ameloblastoma: A critical appraisalen_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record