Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcMillan, K
dc.contributor.advisorGibbons, M.J
dc.contributor.authorToefy, R
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-12T17:38:34Z
dc.date.available2023-06-12T17:38:34Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11394/10173
dc.descriptionDoctor Educationisen_US
dc.description.abstractOur understanding of the macrofauna of hard intertidal substrata around South Africa is fairly comprehensive, and we have a good understanding of the environmental factors responsible for structuring macrofaunal communities (McQuaid & Branch, 1985; Bustamante et al., 1996; Emanuel et al., 1992). The same cannot be said for meiofaunal communities of rocky shores, which despite their neglect are known to play an important role in the functioning of many intertidal systems (Gibbons & Griffiths, 1986). While macrofauna may dominate rocky shores in terms of biomass, meiofauna are generally more abundant, and because they have faster turnover rates they make an important contribution to secondary production (Gibbons & Griffiths, 1986).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of the Western Capeen_US
dc.subjectForaminiferaen_US
dc.subjectGelidium pristoidesen_US
dc.subjectZoologyen_US
dc.subjectGelidiales: Rhodophytaen_US
dc.subjectKeutzingen_US
dc.titleStudies of foraminifera associated with gelidium pristoides (turner) keutzing (gelidiales: rhodophyta)en_US
dc.rights.holderUniversity of the Western Capeen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record